this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
10 points (81.2% liked)

Economy

696 readers
83 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In short, results were positive, but how can we be sure that they’re not really negative, and as such we recommend against proceeding with a 4-day work week.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Same as all the other times it's been tried then?

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The wording makes it easy to keep it at 40hr workweeks with 4x10s. They did mention reduced hours without a pay cut, so I'll infer they meant 32hr workweeks.

It needs to be worded as 32hr workweeks otherwise dummies will jump on the 4x10 train.

Regardless, 32hr workweeks as a standard will never happen in he US, at least not any time soon. I wouldn't be surprised if we raised it to 50.

[–] varnia@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If we talk about the 4-day work week in Europe, it's common sense we mean 4x8h. No one in their right mind would think about 10h per day.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Glad to hear Europeans are reasonable LOL.

Any time this is brought up my fellow Americans immediately respond with the 4x10 nonsense.

But on topic I'd personally prefer shorter days so a 30hr workweek at 5x6 would be cool too. But this is subjective and also depends on the profession. And the point is definitely less hours for same/more pay.

Less hours and more flexibility.