this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023

19 points (95.2% liked)

Selfhosted

42858 readers

788 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Lemmy on a raspberry pi (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by blotz@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does anyone run their own Lemmy instance on a pi? How was the process of setting it up? Were there any pitfalls? How is performance?

[Edit] So a lot of testing around. Compiling from scratch, etc, etc...

So far i have tried

installing lemmy using rootless docker (on 0.17.3)
compiling the image 0.18 docker image as arm

rootless docker did not work well for me. lots of systemd issues and i gave up after running into a lot of issues. I tried rootless docker for security reasons. minimal permissions, etc.

When trying to compile the latest lemmy image in arm, i ran into issues with muslrust not having an arm version. It might be worth investigating rewriting the docker file from 0.17.3 to work with 0.18.0 but i haven't investigated that fully yet! I tried compiling the latest image because i wanted to be able to use the latest features

At the moment, I'm trying to set lemmy to run under bare metal. Im currently attempting to compile lemmy under arm. If that works, i'll start setting up .service files to start up lemmy and pictrs.

top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] marsara9@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was able to get it setup, main things to watch out for:

Don't use the provided docker compose file. Or more precisely don't build from source and lookup the correct image tag on docker hub first.
The documentation was a bit confusing. This isn't really specific for the Pi but since I was creating a compose file from scratch some of the steps listed didn't quite explain all of the details.

I only used it for testing purposes, but performance was fine (on a Pi4 4gb). Note I only ever had one user.

[–] TheInsane42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As I only want to use it for myself as jump-off point (and to mess around a tad) I'm fine with performance on an RPi4 (have the 8 GB version), but I'm struggling to get it next to the rest in my Debian install on it.

Local install fails as I need imagemagick 7 (Debian still had 6.9), and it refuses to compile with imei method. (that script wants to use /usr/local/bin/identify which I think it needs to install itself (part of imagemagick) and the compose file I couldn't get to work with an external (already hosted) postgres.

Any tips? I'm totally new with docker and ansible.

[–] blotz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Im looking at setting up a lemmy instance on a rpi3 with cloudflared tunnel! I'm curious to see if anyone else has done this and how it was.

Edit: I'll give it a whirl and hopefully post an update from my new instance later!

[–] Tolstoy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Please don't forget to give us updates on your adventure^^

[–] HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey OP, I'm on a similar journey (except I'm using an rpi kubernetes cluster)

I don't have advice but I do want to wish you good luck

[–] JasonWeen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Here: my daily "simply a nice stranger" award goes to you

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not yet, but I'm planning to. And I don't think there will be any "pitfalls" at all other than your microsd dying in a couple of months rather than years due to it getting hammered constantly by API requests, etc.

[–] r00ty@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You could plug in a USB SSD or HDD and make sure the DB and other regularly written data goes there. That would pretty much remove the problem.

I would wonder how well it would perform. The limited memory and cpu power surely would make database access not great under even moderate load.

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

You are right -- I completely forgot about those, thanks.

I would wonder how well it would perform.

Something between "usable" to "a complete nightmare" -- depending of how popular the lemmy instance is. Which would scare new users away, leaving it as a "cool kids only" thing. Then again, theres the fact that the power draw is little to none, which is very important regarding most self-hosting stuff -- "can't use it if I can't maintain it".

[+] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What user cap would a pi have running an instance?

[–] blotz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you asking me what i plan to set the cap to? I guess just me. I cant see anyone else wanting to run off a pi from my house and there are so many other instances to join.

[–] Path23@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m a newbie here but what would be the benefit of running an instance just for yourself?

[–] HunterHog@pathfinder.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The ability to host your own data - both for privacy, and insurance that the instance you host your account in won’t suddenly disappear.

[–] thegreenguy@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I would also add that Lemmy is part of the fediverse, meaning it is federated. Federation means all instances "talk" to all instances (unless they defederate), so you aren't limited only to the content on one instance (or in some cases not even Lemmy, case in point: I'm posting this from my kbin.social account).

[–] adora@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

same!

[–] Adama@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What happens to posts/comments and any media/content that is hosted on a server that just goes away (for example if I created one virtually and then deleted it or if a sdcard on a pi is corrupted)

[–] marsara9@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If you upload an image to that server, the image will be gone. Your comments will still exist on other federated instances, assuming that instance was federated in the first place. But any replies to those communities will not propagate once the hosting instance is offline.

For example assume you have 3 instances, A, B, and C. You have an account on A and create a post to a community on A. At some point A goes away, but those posts and that community will still exist on B and C. So you create a new account on B, and reply to one of those posts... users on C won't be able to see those replies as A isn't there to broadcast those replies out. And if someone on C creates a new post on that community from A, you wouldn't be able to see it on B either.

P.S. The same is true if A just decides to defederate instead of shutting down. (other than the images and accounts would still exist obviously).

[+] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I meant what is the user limit based on the power of the raspberry pi tech specs.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Basically the limit would be the speed of the database and the drive it runs on. If you connect a SATA SSD via usb3 it shouldn't be too bad. Can't tell you exact figures but a few hundred users is probably ok if you don't expect the site to be super responsive.

load more comments