this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
619 points (100.0% liked)

196

16822 readers
1303 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 106 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This reminded me of the stroke in my teens, in coma dream I was told by what seemed to be a 4th dimensional person, I will survive but will die at the age of 42… or in ‘42 (2042). I can’t remember which, as I just suffered a massive stroke lol.

Now, I’m not one to believe in premonitions, but that coma dream has haunted me and I’m not even a spiritual person.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 92 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 65 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Johanno@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Requiescat in pace in peace, you heathen

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Ripperoni in pepperonis in peace

One can only hope lol.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Rest in peace in peace

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Remind me 19 years

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In 2042 you'll be 62ish or something I don't wanna think about math, but that's around the average American life expectancy and isn't too bad.

[–] smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maths understander here, in 2042 they'll be 60, not 62. Also the average life expectancy in the US is around 77-78 years, i.e. enough of a difference compared to 60 that you could more or less fit (and live to see) a grandkid/great-grandkid's entire childhood in there.

Although that 79 years figure is Life Expectancy at Birth, in practice it tends to be longer for most surviving adults older than a certain point, mostly because the lower ranges of the chart hit their allotted moment and pass on for whatever reason, leaving the remaining average higher still

~~Of course, with calculus living rent free in my head rn thanks to the uni course of the same name, I'm wondering what that chart of "current age vs expected remaining age" looks like, and where the point of "ageing faster than your remaining likely time grows" lies~~

Edit: source turned out to be a little out of date (although they always tend to bicker a little on the exact number), corrected for it

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I thought it was closer to 70, but apparently it's 77 as of 2022

[–] richtellyard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's very interesting, thank you

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not close to average life expectancy in the US.

Okay, source I used was a little out of date (was looking at 2015 numbers, oops), but even the 2022 numbers disagree somewhat. OECD claims 77, CIA claims 78.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I thought it was closer to 70, but I guess it's around 77 as of 2022, so I was a lot more off than I expected

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's because 42 is the answer from the book hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy, and subconsciously could permeate your thoughts. Not because is in 42 years or when you're 42.

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate to disappoint, but I hadn’t heard of the franchise until 2005, due to the movie. As you might imagine, hearing 42 used in works like that would give me chills.

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nice feedback, still on brand with the answer.
Maybe you're the original hitchhiker.

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My dad died when he was 42. You don’t happen to be a huge alcoholic with no memory prior to 1992? Are you my reincarnated father?

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I don’t drink alcohol and remember far too much of a life I wish I could forget.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well then! Alcohol seems like the right solution for you! Maybe it's time to start. /s

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I have no Idea what this genre of humor is, but I kinda dig it. Cosmic absurdity mixed with internet "haha so random" humor?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is this post-postmodernism?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We should probably pick a new name for modernism

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I propose continuing with modernerism. Post-modernerism, super-post-modernerism, way-past-due-modernerism and so on.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 6 points 1 year ago

New-Wave Modernism Revival

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I've always liked "Steve"..

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not even three comments into a shitpost and I'm already being asked to classify granular neologistic artistic movements. Fuck me.

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Art is a lie, nothing is real?

It's a question?

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I've heard it referred to as meta-modernism. the writer and director for everything everywhere all at once liked using that term to describe the movie.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

feels surrealist? because of how surreal it is?

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds a bit like the "john dies at the end" series, I've heard it described other ways but I think of it as cosmic horror comedy

A good example of what things are like I feel is the start of chapter 9 at mcdonalds(if you stop there it won't spoil anything) for the weirdness and then you have stuff like aiming a dog's butt at people like a gun and it being a deadly threat

[–] BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I absolutely LOVE John dies at the end, wish they would make movies out of the rest of the books. In the meantime, do you have any movie/TV recommendations that are similar?

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

about 2 cuils

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's called my favourite

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

ive been calling stuff like this neo-surrealism since it's surrealist in a distinctly post-internet way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 41 points 1 year ago

"What is this existential crisis doing in my soup?!"

"It appears to be doing the backstroke, sir."

load more comments
view more: next ›