this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
25 points (96.3% liked)

Sysadmin

8105 readers
4 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world
00Lemming@lemmy.world
L3s@lemmy.world
25
Someone shouldn't be able to have the @admin username (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by Izzent@lemmy.world to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It's confusing for new users, and this instance in particular has 7k users but no interactions. It's a bot army, with the top user being called @admin.

Extremely shady and misleading.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

FYI, I'm not going to remove this post or anything (and I agree as well), but it's not likely to be seen by the right people here. /c/Sysadmin is just our community for discussing sysadmin things and I don't know how much /u/Ruud or any Lemmy devs hang out here.

You might try cross-posting it to these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

Of note, lemmy.ml is the server that is operated by the primary Lemmy devs.

[–] Izzent@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Oh wow, I didn't realize, sorry! Thought I was in the right place. I could still remove it if you think it's for the best?

[–] MeowdyPardner@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a ticket to fix this on kbin which would allow each instance admin to block regular users from registering common names of authority: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/359

[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Damn I gotta go lock in a @potus username before it's too late

[–] average650@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I think just banning them is enough. On other instances it will indicate they are on another instance.

[–] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

just wow. Should be reported in github to main lemmy repo

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Doesn’t this depend on each instance though?

[–] Izzent@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think some form of blanket ban on certain keywords in usernames should be used. Admin being an obvious one, but I'm sure a lot more would also be problematic.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I guess what I meant is, how? It could be put into Lemmy sourcecode but since its open source that could be easily removed.

Each instance could possibly try and autoban any other instance user with that name?

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What if a persons real name is Admin in some weird language?

A bit far-fetched I know. Still, I think that if theres gonna be a global hardcoded blacklist of usernames, someone should be very careful which words is added to that list. Each specific instance would know better what words is good and what is bad in their main language(s).

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] jinno@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

This makes me want to legally change my name to admin admin

[–] ILeftReddit@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Then that sucks for them

[–] V699@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Ironically the link in OP is to the actual admin of this site

[–] Habnab@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eh, why not? It's just a name.

[–] PaintedSnail@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

For those of us who understand how the platform works, it wouldn't be an issue. However, if we want mass adoption of the platform, we need to take into consideration those who don't fully understand the technology and avoid situations that will lead to scams where feasible. Names of authority, like admin, root, super, etc., make a user appear to have authority they don't, which can mislead new users. ("Support our server by sending bitcoin to this address that is really my personal wallet" type scams comes to mind.) You could say that it's the person's fault for falling for it, but it's something that would drive people away from the platform which can be easily avoided in the first place.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let's not federate with that instance. Then, they can have any bots or username they want.

[–] Izzent@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Usually I'd agree, but there has to be something more that can be done to prevent others from putting keywords like that in their name. Otherwise it'll just happen again...

[–] Master@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think admin, administrator and those type names (system administrator, sys admin etc) should be reserved but you shouldnt ban admin as being part of a name. What about sadmin / sadminute... or badmin / badminute (and every variantion of that like MadMinotaur )and other variants like that.

[–] migratory_bird@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Or anything relating to badminton the sport

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

for other instances it's name will appear as : @admin@Podycust ...so not such a big deal

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 0 points 2 years ago

Official instance admin and community mod roles are denoted with badges, though. That's consistent across every instance already.

I could change my name to admin and post here, but it wouldn't give me any superpowers. Looking at my remote @admin user from a federated instance wouldn't badge me as an admin for that instance.

I don't see the problem or see how that affects anyone. There can be an @john on every instance. Is that confusing for users, too? Should every instance coordinate and make sure there's only one @john to rule them all? Who is the best John, and how is that determined?

That's just how the fediverse works.