this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
94 points (97.0% liked)

Futurology

2128 readers
111 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lugh@futurology.today 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Computers are starting to use staggering amounts of electricity. There is a trade-off here between the utility of the tasks they perform and the climate damage caused by generating all the electricity they need. Bitcoin mining is thought to be currently using 2% of America's electricity and seems an especially egregious waste of energy.

Radically diminishing computer's electricity requirements as they become more powerful should be seen as an urgent task.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aren't modern computers taking way less energy than before per work? We just keep using more of it faster than the energy use decreases?

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes and yes

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It has an even larger load in China. The invention of cryptocurrency has been a blight on the environment.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So the whole chip is a complicated lens, that somehow can perform multiplication using 'analogue computation'.

Arxiv link

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imo, analog computation is the way forward with this whole AI thing. It seems like a waste to perform calculations bit-by-bit when neural nets are generally okay with "fuzzy math" anyway.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't want fuzzy math anywhere near autonomous armed machines. You want ED-209? Because that's how you get ED-209.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

human brains are the epitome of fuzzy math machines

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And have you seen what we've done with weapons for the entirety of our history?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah so nothing will change

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well we'd no longer be the dominant life form on the planet, and we'd get dealt a lot of our own medicine. So, quite a lot would change.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Uuuh fuzzy results?

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, I personally agree, but the military has already made it clear they don't mind. ED-209 is basically an inevitability at this point.

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

"fuzzy" isn't the right word.

[–] BasicTraveler@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Idk, maybe. But i think you may have issues with tolerances and reproducibility. With analog and neutral nets your going to have edgecases where some devices will give vastly differing outcomes. For something that's fine but not for others.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like we're building a true android then.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So first we tricked rocks into doing math, and now we've figured out how to trick glass into doing math? This is truly amazing.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We tricked the same rocks we use for doing math into bending light like the glass, and we use that for doing math, yes.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Reality is mind boggling sometimes.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Digital is also analog.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Automobile analogy: there is no replacement for displacement.... until there is?