this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
816 points (95.5% liked)

News

30946 readers
2491 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Times instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept.

The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by internally displaced Palestinians, who fled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees.

While the document is presented as an outline for maintaining objective journalistic principles in reporting on the Gaza war, several Times staffers told The Intercept that some of its contents show evidence of the paper’s deference to Israeli narratives.

Almost immediately after the October 7 attacks and the launch of Israel’s scorched-earth war against Gaza, tensions began to boil within the newsroom over the Times coverage. Some staffers said they believed the paper was going out of its way to defer to Israel’s narrative on the events and was not applying even standards in its coverage. Arguments began fomenting on internal Slack and other chat groups.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NYT doing a pigshit job. Color me surprised

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I actually am surprised by that. The times is generally reliable on most subjects.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

No, it hasn't for decades. They've just been relying on that reputation.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their op ed pages, in particular, have been unhinged lunacy for years.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Isn't that like what op eds are for though? Like an op ed is essentially a newspaper letting a journalist or a non-journalist) say "personally though, I'm just saying..."

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Op eds are to bring in thoughts from people who maybe arent good journalists, thats true, but given the field of possible missed perspectived they still fielded a disproportionate number of like straight up covid misinfo and transphobia, to the point where I think their op ed strategy might be hate clicks or something to sell ads rather than alternate perspectives nobody has heard before.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well we get the Sunday times and my wife just confirmed that bit about the transphobia, so I have to admit, that is distressing. Neither of us have noticed the covid misinfo, but I'm inclined to take your word for it.

All that said... It's still the op ed section... This is what it's meant for. These views are explicitly not endorsed by the publisher. The op ed is a section at least in part, designed to be a space for dissenting opinions. If nothing else, this is where you can read about what some other people are saying. If you like, you can think of it as intelligence gathering on the opposition.

In the end, I just think it's not being fair to say that The Times as a whole is bad source because their crazy section is crazy. I mean, that section is well labeled. Actually, I think what's really frightening is that those crazy views are in fact relatively mainstream in much of the country; I would argue that it's good to know just how crazy things are getting.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago

cough Iraq cough WMDs cough