this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
775 points (98.4% liked)

Firefox

20384 readers
137 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For real, I already have different groups for tabs, they're called windows.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But now I will be able to have tabs within groups within windows within desktops!

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the part I absolutely don't get about this. Plus windows create a better visual boundary for the context-switch tab groups are supposed to be as you minimize one and restore another.

Why not just use windows? 🤷 I sure hope they keep the implementation of this simple and end up just doing that for the user. Create new tab group -> color-coded new window opens up, gently nudging the user towards how simple the solution to their problem actually is.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Tab groups in chrome are something I dearly miss from chrome. It’s super convenient for grouping projects and quickly switching between them. Multiple windows is a worse experience: there’s no preview favicon or anything to indicate what a window is actually for until you hover over it. With a tab I can see at a glance what something is before I switch.

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Every instance of the same program eats memory