this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
1057 points (98.7% liked)

politics

20415 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Criminals know stealing is best done in the shadows. Stupid criminals get in the public eye by taking a public office where everyone is looking at them and what they are doing or did.

Trump and Santos are stupid criminals.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I honestly don't think Trump initially meant to win. Go watch the video in Trump Tower when they announce. Everyone is partying down, Trump is in the back, on a couch, head in hands.

We could fairly argue that he showed a typical reaction to winning the highest office in the land! I now see a man who realized he would be exposed, big time.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree. I think his original plan was to run, lose, and then claim that the election was rigged against him. Then, he'd have spent 4 years grifting. He'd also have been paid to appear on right wing media to talk about how President Hillary was bungling X and how he would handle X so much better. (All without giving any details on how he'd handle X.)

Basically, what he's done since leaving office in 2021.

Of course, once he was in office, he got addicted to the power and now he wants that back. Plus, he sees it as the only way to avoid prison. So his 2024 Presidential bid is 100% serious.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well put. The irony is he could have just straightened up his act once in office and got away with his old crimes, but he is incapable of that.

The compounding factor is he's a pootin puppet so once in office, it was a deluge of new crimes to sow chaos and please the master.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I think you're dead on with this

I honestly don’t think Trump initially meant to win.

My not-totally-serious-but-maybe theory is that they initially told Trump they were just shooting a mockumentary about him running for President and they only told him it was all real the night he won.

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, Stone and Manafort were getting away with murder-by-proxy for decades, pretty much everyone gets away with taking totally-not-bribes, that stuff is just how the system works. Now we're getting people too stupid to get away with it even with the table tilted in their favor to within an inch of being totally vertical.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lack of accountability draws in all the people comitting crimes. It corrupts the government the same ways it corrupts the catholic church.

[–] catfish@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

craven, clinical need for attention kinda guys