this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
825 points (99.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7116 readers
364 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
825
Trump orders destruction of CO2 measure satelites (slrpnk.net)
submitted 5 days ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/climate@slrpnk.net
130 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://futurism.com/white-house-orders-nasa-destroy-important-satellite

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'll never understand the whole assigning blame routine

Proceeds to assign blame:

There's plenty of people and organizations to blame, from Rupert Murdock to the Heritage Foundation and beyond.

And then continues to assign blame:

Well, no, I guess if I'm going to be honest here it does help the sociopathic oligarchs maintain control. So congratulations - you're fighting for the wrong fucking side.

So guess you understand it just fine.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You'll really go to any extent possible to avoid the idea of solidarity, won't you?

So whatever you win I guess? Since that apparently is all you seem to care about, which is just ludicrous and bizarre. So go on with your bad self. Or something?

Weirdo

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

You'll really go to any extent possible to avoid the idea of solidarity, won't you?

The say while continuously behaving in a way contrary to solidarity.

So whatever you win I guess? Since that apparently is all you seem to care about, which is just ludicrous and bizarre. So go on with your bad self. Or something? Weirdo

Because that's not a paragraph typed out by someone trying to "win" whatever the fuck they think this is. This is one of those "every accusation is a confession" situations.