this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
547 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

12997 readers
1168 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oysvendsen@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The Albuquerque Police Department said no charges are expected to be filed against the woman who crashed into VanLandingham.

WTF?!

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s an old joke among American lawyers that if you’re going to murder someone in America, do it with your car. But it’s not really a joke, because the cops will 100% assume it was just an accident, and prosecutors will refuse to bring any charges.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

what happened to the good old man-slaughter which should also apply in cases of accidents

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 14 points 1 week ago

12 out of 12 jurors will be drivers. They will not convict another driver for being distracted because they also do it all the time. Prosecutors know this and don't wan to waste time on pointless cases.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not the driver that kills, it's the car. How are you going to assign man-slaughter charges to an inanimate object?

PS: The inverse is true for guns tho.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it was just a little accident. haven't you ever bumped into someone by mistake before?

jeez, before are so uptight about this, it's not a big deal, just a harmless little accident

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

If anything, it was the cyclists/pedestrians fault for traveling unprotected by a car. /s

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

“Traffic collision”. ‘Accident’ implies no one’s to blame.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Well, as the article's headline tells us, it was a "bike crash". Probably be charges laid posthumously so that the motorist can sue for civil damages. (Modulo being killed, this happened to someone I know; hit by a car in the bike lane, had to pay for the car's damage.)