this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)
Books
6221 readers
53 users here now
A community for all things related to Books.
Rules
- Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
- No spam. All posts should be related to books.
Official Bingo Posts:
Related Communities
Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I just finished Stephen Baxter's World Engines: Destroyer and while it was OK, I have the uncomfortable feeling that I'm discovering unsavory things about Baxter. There are commonalities in his main characters that are... unattractive? One main character, fine. But when the main character is basically the same character in different settings and with different names; and when the story literally contains "and then, everyone clapped"... well, I don't know. The writing is better than I could do, and I'm interested to see where it goes, but I don't know if I can enjoy the libertarian fantasy overtones. I'm torn.
I'm a couple chapters into A. Tchaikovsky's Shroud, and have great expectations. I know I like Tchaikovsky's world building and writing, and this looks so far like another novel (innovative?) premise from a great author.
Yeah, Stephen Baxter is somewhat sus. I liked his collaboration with Arthur C. Clarke, and I really liked reading his books when I was a kid who couldn't really understand the politics. He has some really interesting concepts (Manifold: Time fucking BLEW MY MIND when I was like 12), but yeah, he has some very libertarian politics that lead to some, uh, interesting plot points.
Whew, it's not just me. I'm always cautious about assuming things about authors.