468
Trump seen pocketing FIFA medal before handing Chelsea replica championship trophy
(www.the-independent.com)
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
468 points (93.3% liked)
Not The Onion
17243 readers
1282 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm all for dunking on him but it looks like he was given it, and I haven't seen any other evidence suggesting the medal was intended to be given back: https://youtu.be/b5I2adhIn7U?t=174
Fake news isn't less bad just because it's "your side" doing it
Retroactively gifting it doesn't erase that he stole it
If you have credible evidence saying it was only gifted retroactively, please link it. The video evidence does not appear support that interpretation of events.
Yes it does learn human interaction.
The guy asks for it back, goes it the pocket and he shrugs it off.
That's not giving it stupido
Why wouldn't they announce it ahead of time, or during the ceremony?
Don't be naive.
I have linked a video showing what actually happened, linked a verified signatory of the International Fact Checking Network and member of the European Fact-Checking Standards Network saying that it was given to him and that the submitted headline is misleading, and your response is "don't be naive".
Are you guys fucking for real? What the fuck even counts as credible evidence to you anymore!?
How many leaders of the host country got a medal before him?
Will they hand them out to future hosts as well?
Bingo question of the year.
Do you not understand how PR works? If they gave it to him, the President of the United States, who was literally there in person, do you really think he would have just slyly pocketed it? Or do you think they would have said, "we are giving this to you"?
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is a good example of how certain people come to believe in conspiracy theories.
They are faced with a seemingly overwhelming argument that destroys some fictional narrative they chose in their head, probably because they misremember or misunderstood some basic fact behind that narrative in the past (like not listening to a thing during math and sciences classes).
Re-evaluation of all the facts in light of new information would be too taxing, and probably lead to an undesirable outcome even if completed successfully (like realising they were wrong, and possibly start questioning themselves), so a different strategy is employed.
This consists of cherry picking a very minute aspect of a bigger picture (here, that trump puts the medal in his pocket) and spin a whole narrative around it.
This works surprisingly well, at least for them, since their brain has either forgotten the conflicting facts, or outright fails to recognise their glaring ignorance about all other possibilities to explain that minute aspect differently (like the fact that the guy handing over the medal to trump is talking to him, in what looks very much like the act of gifting him the medal).
Where this unfortunately breaks down is when other people, not so reality-impared, challenge them by pointing out the glaring factual omissions.
This is usually seen as a personal attack, like they're being called out individually and being called unpleasant things (which can be usually the case), and will respond by questioning the other person's character, intelligence and/or intentions.
Oh, and downvoting.
why are you trying so hard to support a convicted rapist and suspected pedophile?
Accepting whatever makes "the other side" look bad instead of fighting for the truth is the reason we're in this thread talking about that dipshit [Trump]. I'm not sure I'll ever understand why the fuck people in this thread fighting against that so hard
it's great you have morals and integrity, but there's a time and place for that.
when dealing with fascist pedophile scumbags that continue to corrupt society, leave the gloves at home. otherwise, you're only supporting those same scumbags who continue to rape and pillage.
in a fight to the death there is no such thing as a clean fight, only survival.
Okay, in do-or-die wartime I can accept some suppression of the truth.
If you genuinely believe the situation in the US is so bad and analogous to wartime that it's worth spreading and supporting lies for the sake of "winning" then you need to stop wasting your time commenting on nottheonion posts and go figure out how to win. At the very least don't waste time talking to people like me who spend time on truth, set up an automated posting farm and flood the entire internet with anti-Trump propaganda with no attention wasted on what's true or otherwise ethical or moral.
If it's not that bad and you can afford to piss away time here then you can still afford the truth.
Pick a consistent position and take actions that align with whatever you pick, but don't try to have your cake and eat it too, it just comes across as hypocrisy to the rest of us. I hope to either see you around or not see you for a few years -- and nothing in-between.
I got a job and bills to pay dude. in what universe would I have the time to build out a bot farm that rivals the Russian propaganda machine built on the backs of millions with unlimited funds?
get real.
the only way I can make a difference is by coming on lemmy and pissing on your shoe.
Thanks for letting us know that your conviction is just performative shoe-pissing.
it's actually pathetic you would think such a weak attack on my character would bother me.
I'm not a magat so proving myself or my convictions for trolls online isn't a concern of mine.
Fuck off, troll.
Ask Cole Palmer what he thinks since this was a totally normal thing to do and not in anyway confusing.
Also I'm 100% calling bullshit and this gift was to save face. Chelsea players we're pissed he was even there.
This doesn't contradict the article. It explicitly says he was given the medal by Infantino in the subheader and the article body.
Yes, but the implication of "given the medal to look at" and "pocketing FIFA medal" is that Trump "stole" it or wasn't supposed to keep it, which I haven't seen supported by a credible source yet.
Edit: regarding your own edit (adding the second image), I found no information at the linked source supporting the sentence as presented.
Historically. Do they give those medals to other country leaders or nonplayers.
Find that answer and the truth will be yours
Also nobody asking why the fuck he would be gifted a medal in the first place? Medals typically have meaning behind them. They represent achievement. What the fuck did Trump do to earn that medal, other than show up to the ceremony?
I guess I shouldn't be surprised, he's been getting gifted medals from stupid fucking morons for doing fuck all for the past 10 goddamn years. Of course he would think that being handed a medal to look at is the same thing as being presented with one to keep.
He's a thief, through and through.
Trump is a convicted felon, promoted beans at the resolute desk, received millions of dollars in inauguration fundraising from big tech, has his own cryptocurrency which he promoted by promising presidential access, and is being called a madman by economists for the least stable US economic policy since Bretton Woods.
Trump is not like "other country leaders". Historically the above would be disqualifying for "other country leaders". You can't cover news about him like "other country leaders". I almost can't believe that you're saying that you can.
This is the complete most idiotic, moronic and stupid argument ever presented in my like 20 years of being a dumbass arguing on the Internet.
Donald Trump is different so he didn't steal the medal.
This is your argument.
No. He stole the fucking medal and the other guy understood all of what you're saying, decided it isn't worth it and moved on.
But he stole the medal.
I don't think he's saying it was ok. Reads to me like Trump gets regular passes on all kinds of shit for some unfathomable reason.
Pretty sure the ad guy for the Independent website posted this.