this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
452 points (97.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41036 readers
673 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What will it take to make PeerTube relevant enough that people will creat content and follow creatos on the fediverse?

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Most "non tech-savvy" people I've tried to explain the concept of open source software and initiatives like the Fediverse to just outright don't trust them. Whilst they might say they'd prefer for software and services to not track or manipulate them if you asked them directly, they can't truly conceive of tech that doesn't.

The only interactions these people have had with the digital world have been as part of the modern data scraping hellscape that was once termed "Web 2.0" after the internet went mainstream in the '00s. They weren't part of the internet when it was a niche interest and more open, so they know no better and accept that predatory behaviour as the way of things.

I'm not an expert in psychology but I don't think it's overly dramatic to say it puts me in mind of those poor individuals who were abused as children, never received therapy and go on to seek out other abusers in adulthood.

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

The masses don't know how to search for information anymore. Not only that, but they are unable to do so with the disparity of their understanding of the search engines and the current state of search engines. People are used to being fed information through an algorithm, and those who control the algorithm aren't about to promote a competitor that'd take away their money.

[–] frittoBee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it possible for creators to earn money on PeerTube? If not, maybe that's what's holding a lot of them back. And of course the fact that most people don't know what PeerTube is. It should be easily accessible for everyone and have some kind of system to give the creators money. And make the switch from YouTube easy.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most creators on YouTube make their main money from patreon/merch anyway. No reason you can't do that on peertube.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Making money on merch/patreon can only happen once your channel is established though. Until then, YouTube creators are dependent on ad revenue to keep them going, and probably operate at a loss until they reach the point where they can supplement that ad revenue. Trying to get yourself established on a platform that doesn't offer any ad revenue is a much harder sell.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As much as I like federation, stuff like nebula seems like a better solution.

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The issue is that nebula doesn't offer the community aspect that YouTube offers

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Start randomly insulting eachother and gaslight one another in comment sections. You'll build up the hate in no time at all.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure they don't let just anyone on Nebula, which is a big part of the problem. Absolutely anyone can upload content to YouTube.

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 day ago

It's not about the comments, it's more about the creators creating the youtubesphere

Yeah I have a subscription there. I recommend it.

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago

It's possible, but they have to implement the paywall or ad revenue by themselves. They are allowed to monetize, but it's not necessarily trivial or even profitable, at this point.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Accessibility, usability, scalability at very, very large scale, actual searchability, and actual return on investment, because some people actually get money from youtube?

Actually, peertube, depending on the instance and the popularity of the content, can be incredibly frustrating for a viewer. And it can be frustrating to the content creator. Some people are quick to dismiss minor (and less minor) annoyances, are able to look for fixes, and so on, but for almost everyone? The experience is nightmareish, with incertain returns (or no returns at all, as it stands).

Once you fix all that, you might have a chance to convince larger entities to move to peertube. Well, more realistically, to host their own instance. Well, more realistically, to host multiple instances, because really some people would hammer the platform down with each video. See the issue yet?

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree, but I didn't really get the last point about hammering the platform.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Peer to peer viewing can only go so far. Some people, when they put a video out, get hundred of thousands of view in the span of a few minutes. This works relatively well on youtube, with a very large CDN (and probably some heuristics for big accounts). It is enough to hinder "smaller" platforms like dailymotion. It would just be a terrible experience on peertube as it is now, unless the creator preemptively mirrored it in many, many places beforehand.

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe the peer to peer aspect of it could sustain big amounts of viewers

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago

Not really, at least not when viewers all flood in once the video is out.

In this situation, everyone needs a file, but barely anyone can share it, leading to terrible bandwidth.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nothing.

There is a massive gap between the aspirations of online consumers, and actual consumer behavior.

People will never ever support creators, that's the bottom line. People are greedly little fucks and they like it. Don't fool yourself.

I say this as a former massive streamer will millions of watched hours. People. Are. Shit.

[–] frittoBee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it has a lot to do with people not having enough money. I'd love to support every creator I like but its simply not possible. If we'd all earn enough money the creators would earn more as well.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

Exactly! Sometimes I feel I do not support creators/open source projects enough, but then I remember I'm dead poor and sometimes can't afford food without going into debt, so hey, I'm not quite in the position to.

And there are quite a lot of people like me. Once the situation improves a little, they first improve their standards of living a little, they get to afford and buy things they long needed, and only then can they actually spare money to support someone or something.

Many don't get to the latter part for a long while.

[–] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago

Sorry, but I don't think what you said is correct. People love supporting others and it happens all the time to many creators. Sorry your experience was negative.