this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
502 points (99.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8260 readers
568 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A.I. aside, we should get 4 day work weeks regardless.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But… like… do you think someone would openly campaign with a plan that fucks everyone over? I… I just remembered that Trump is a thing…

But yea, such law would necessitate that

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

how does a law force companies to scale wages instead of firing? At-will employment is a thing. How does a law also retroactively make all at-will employment subject to investigation if they dont scale wages and fire instead? What laws around the world accomodate this kind of situation?

Lots of people advocate for things that have unforseen consequences. Its not impossible for that to happen, no?

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Dude…

Company needs x amounts of work done for which it requires y amounts of employees. An av employee is not going to take exponentially more work on its shoulders all so that the companys profit line, so the company will keep all its employees it requires plus a few ceos…

Could some companies tittering on bankruption go up? Yes, but their and their owners/shareholders interest is to be secondary of that of the greater public

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

so the company will keep all its employees it requires

Is that not the case now? Companies only have the staff the require at any time, no? So if hours get cut, they cut staff, no? I'm all for reducing work weeks to 4 days, it honestly won't bother me even if I take a pay cut, I make enough right now so a pay cut won't hurt me. I'm just wondering how in the world is my employer going to feel incentivized to pay me more an hour to work fewer hours. Let's say I make $100/hour (I don't). I work 40 hours a week. $4000 a week, cool. Now a law happens: I can only work 32 hours for full time and more than that is overtime. I'm still making $100/hr, no? Okay, $3200 a week. That's fine and dandy if you make that much, but I'm just wondering how that helps people who make minimum wage and whatnot. They can just keep working 5 days, overtime now, to keep up their bills while I, a person who makes more than them, get to enjoy the sweat off of their back on my off day?

This already happens with weekends: poor people work them, not the rich. It's not a zero sum thing, but I'd absolutely prefer a solid UBI plan than a 32 hour work week. With a UBI, a 32 hour work week can just happen naturally as people work less.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Its not in their interest to pay you more, tough knuckies for them as it will be mandated

Why do you think you need their consent and support?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 28 minutes ago

Thats what I was asking, will there be laws to ensure a raise in wages? What are those actual policies being proposed? Is the FCC going to enforce it? The trump FCC is gonna do it or what happens when the next republican president happens?