this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
49 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

49270 readers
729 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My Homelab currently consists of 3 Mini PC's and will eventually be put in a 10" rack

They are all just plugged into the router my ISP provided, I'd like to get a new router that runs open-source software and create a new network from it. I have no idea where to begin.

What hardware would you recommend?

Bonus: If possible I'd like to in the future attach a sim card to my network as a backup for the occasion that the ISP connection drops. (just a nice to have)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I've had the opposite experience with Mikrotik.

I really wanted to like it, but (I say this as a former Cisco instructor) their approach to UI and documentation is terrible (the docs don't tell you what's what, just tell you how to setup a specific config, without explaining what they're doing or why, even worse, they start numbering their eth interfaces from 1 - it took me a while to figure this out).

Worse, it was unstable as hell. I setup one just as a test, with one laptop connected via ethernet. Every couple days I wouldn't be able to even ping the laptop - I'd have to reboot the router, manually, since it had become unresponsive.

This with a simple config (just eth2 is LAN, eth1 is external), and no rules.

It may have been a faulty unit, but as a consumer I can't risk assuming this, especially given the very poor docs and clumsy UI/config approach - it all indicates this is a very immature product, definitely not something I'd recommend to a newbie.

I hope they can really improve - the form factor is excellent, the price point is unbeatable, the capabilites of the hardware are extensive.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 minutes ago

I somewhat agree on your comment about documentation and UI (altough once you get used to it, it's manageable) but just to add with my experience on these things: for me they've been rock solid. I've used them both at home and professionally (mostly on small-ish networks) for at least 10 years and they just seem to run just fine.

Currently my home router is RB4011iGS+ and there's been absolutely no problems with it in the 4-5 years it's been on my network. I'm not saying all their models are as reliable and there's not that many models I've had my hands on, but my experience with them has so far been pretty good.

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah the docs are not good, I have been lucky to have a friend with lots of experience in their ecosystem who has been schooling me up on it. Once I got the basic configuration setup its been fine.

I may regret saying that in a bit when I go to add my other components, like my adguard/pi-hole, vpns, ip cameras, and other networked devices but the basic test setup I have now seems to be stable enough to deploy.

I have not seen the connection loss issues but I will keep an eye out for it.