this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
564 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

8436 readers
3121 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 57 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The ones that don't say "advertisement" under.. as a gen z that commits regular piracy

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 70 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

There are 3 "downloads" there without advertisement written under them. Just use the most basic looking button, it's like how the holy grail is the most plain looking one.

That or just use devtools/inspect elements.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago

When you hover your mouse over a clickable area that will send you somewhere, the address shows up at the bottom of your browser. You look at where the link is pointing in order to choose correctly.

Also, none of the above. I use VPN + LibreWolf browser with built in good adblocking + a site like thepiratebay.org + using the magnet links from my search and download my movies and shows with QBittorrent.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, I back out if that Frankenstein curse of a website and go somewhere else to find the download. There is no glory to be found here.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

That's all fine and dandy until you're trying to download a .bin file containing a 12 year old version of the firmware that an ancient piece of tech your entire network relies on up and running again. Sometimes you do what you gotta do.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's such a rush tho, it's like using LimeWire again.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

True, I had to restore my pc a number of times using likewise. People be putting viruses up there

[–] abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

It looks like 3 actually have advertisement under them. Gross

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

How do dev tools help? As a web dev, I know that easily may provide no valuable info

[–] four@lemmy.zip 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can check if a button is just a link to www.freerobbux.ru

(I hope that's not a real site)

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Can't you just hover over it with your mouse?

[–] four@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, that works too

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Inspect the element and check the url to see its destination. It's not perfect but it usually shows what links go to unknown sites.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But that assume it's not a form or javascript driven button. I would agree if you say both of those methods are sketchier, but that doesn't mean they aren't legit for sure.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe they aren't legit, but I have had success using these methods.

Edited my comment as I thought I was replying to the other guy.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying your method can work but also just because you don't see a link that looks right, it's not necessarily proof of malfeasance. Could just be a weird web dev choice, or a concerted effort to keep other services from scraping links from their page. Which maybe you already know, just adding that for anyone who does not know.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying your method can work but also just because you don't see a link that looks right, it's not necessarily proof of malfeasance.

True, but with as many links as the post has it's a good way to narrow down your options, plus I assume every link on a site like this is probably malicious in some way; no risk no reward I guess.

And in situations where this method doesn't work I can just revert to the ole' holy grail strategy (which is clearly perfect in every way).

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Fair reasoning.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 2 points 22 hours ago

The top 2 of the remaining have that white bar which also means an ad usually, so it's either the orange or the plain one imo