this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
317 points (91.8% liked)

Games

20228 readers
394 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm pretty sure this is the same guy who was ranting about Godot "being woke" last year lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

Check the actual reviews.

(the link is for the past week, so will be less and less accurate to the july first start date as the days pass by)

The only two reviews related to the drama are specifically in reaction to the alleged review bombing. The other negative reviews don't mention anything related to the drama at all, and so the increase is probably just due to the streisand effect.

I'll list the two drama-related reviews here trimmed down to the drama-relevant parts only (not the full reviews):

"Drumming up fake drama about a review bombing that never happened to artificially inflate your positive review count through fan counteraction is gross." — Full Review

"Wasn't gonna leave a review but Ludwig and Pirate Software cried review bombing so I'm leaving an honest review to combat the non-existent bombing." — Full Review

As you can see by these excerpts, both of them were made AFTER the allegations of review bombing. They're not part of the review bombing itself that was being talked about.


Edit: fixed inaccurate -> accurate