this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
1465 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

8462 readers
2404 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vala@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

ITT: People who have never done low level networking.

Edit: Without some absolutely crazy hacks, the smallest amount of data you can really transfer or compute on is one byte. 256 requires one byte, 257 requires you to DOUBLE the data used to 2 bytes. Multiply this by whatever data they send and the problem remains the same.

This is the kind of thing that comes up a lot designing custom protocols.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

My experience is that a limit of 256 means they probably are willing to allocate up to 24 bits to send the value over the network:

0x323536

People seem to love to pass around their numbers as JSON or similar.

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Jup, lots of people are talking 64-bit architecture and RAM optimization, whereas the number in question most likely is related to IPv4 packets, which were made for (and to my knowledge still use) octets/8-bit blocks.