this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)

Bay Area

1473 readers
2 users here now

Discussion for all things Bay Area.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Was curious what their objection was: https://www.savedowntownmenlo.org/

The city is required by the state to build certain amount of high-density, low-income housing near transit (in this case, Caltrain). The city is proposing using land already owned by them -- three parking lots next to a congested downtown strip.

FWIW, looks like the main objection might be losing those three parking lots than straight up NIMBY.

[–] brotahari@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/emilyhoeven/article/menlo-park-affordable-housing-20390001.php

"“Hoping to squeeze large apartment buildings into narrow, heavily used downtown parking lots … is not a path to success,” Save Downtown Menlo organizer Alex Beltramo told me in an email. When I pointed out that the Menlo Park City Council has pledged to replace most, if not all, of the 556 parking spaces that would be impacted, Beltramo argued it wouldn’t be sufficient for residents and shoppers and replacing surface lots with parking garages would be “more difficult to navigate and far less convenient.”"

load more comments (5 replies)