this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

News And Current Events

197 readers
17 users here now

For everything that is in the news and what's going on in the world.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The issue is the hormones. Since it is "life-saving" care, they need it in the field, which isn't conducive to being deployed. If someone is trans, but doesn't take hormones, let them stay in.

I also have no issue paying for hormones or surgery when they retire. I do not think trans benefits should be cut for people who have RETIRED from the military. Hell if someone wants a boob job, I have no issues when they retire.

[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Eh, trans surgeries are more or less self-harm, I'm not a fan of the surgeries being subsidized with government funding at all. I oppose the hormones being subsidized as well but am not sure how that could be legislated properly yet.

[–] monogram 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not gay enough, you're going to have to rape me.

If someone serves twenty years and wants to take hormones on the government dime, I have no issue with it.