this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
1038 points (96.3% liked)

Political Humor

1255 readers
26 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

lmao

You're insulting the DNC. You haven't cited a single policy or vote or even quoted any statements out of context, you're basically just trolling instead of any good faith attempt to turn anyone over to your side.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have cited a single policy or vote or even quoted any statements

Meanwhile, someone provides sources and you refused to read them. It looks like you just refuse to listen to anyone that doesn't agree with you.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what sources are for, vetting information. If your source is unreliable then you get called out for it.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not going to sit here and "read more theory" that you keep pulling out

That's not "calling out unreliable sources", that's saying "any source you provide I'm not going to read".

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

when you can’t even say in your own words why Mamdani needs permission from Albany or the governor.

Whats the matter, you hit your word limit and couldn't finish quoting?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll remind you we are currently in the thread where someone was "saying in their own words" and that wasn't good enough for you either.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, they couldn't say why, provide any evidence of their claim and neither could their articles, but I'm supposed to accept the claim as fact? I'm just supposed to sit down and read 6 articles which would print to like 80 pages and then accept their unsubstantial claims as fact for no reason but the sheer number of words placed in front of me? That's really dumb, anon.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you direct me to any of your posts here that provide evidence for your claims?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, check the comments above which made claims.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I went up this thread and didn't see any links. Not interested in searching your entire post history.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you make a point to argue? It looks to me like you admitted you can't even figure out what my statement was. Do you want me to argue that you did understand and pretended not to? Why would I?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 16 hours ago

Sorry, as per your own rules you already resigned from the argument.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Calling a spade a spade is not an insult to the spade.