this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
429 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

25040 readers
1217 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would be fine if it used a custom parameter for their tags. Using class names makes for bad accessibility.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How are class names relevant for accessibility?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They might mean class names can't help screen readers parse meaning, whereas using the correct tag can?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://lemmy.zip/comment/19872383

Usability by third-parties. A webpage is not a pdf.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You think only aria-attributes are accessibility? Most accessible is, what you not need additional tools and interpreters for.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, it's of course not just aria attributes. But it's definitely not "how easy can I create user CSS". Accessibility is a term of art, you can't just expand its meaning to whatever you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Look, if it hinders me in my workarounds for my ADHD while every other framework does less so, then accessibility is worse. Shut up with your trademark gatekeeping bullshit.

Also,