this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1563 points (97.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

8385 readers
2816 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 118 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's what I figured they meant.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, but those other stats are raw numbers. Okay, we have a higher number of unhoused people and food-insecure people, but we also have a higher number of people, period. If you wanna make a point, it has to be per capita. I like how the first stat got this right, but the others did not.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 13 points 3 days ago

Ya might be a good point but it’s a distracting mess

Thankfully we already know a little bit about both of our situations so we get the gist

[–] msage@programming.dev 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

US population: ~350M Japan population: ~125M

Not even 3x as much.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

You're not wrong. I'm just saying, if you want to make that point, you should compare per capita.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

.2% per year? So we should expect about 10% of people to be murdered by 50?

I was going to say .2% is better than I thought, but that’s pretty dire.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

0.2 people, not percentage. That was what they were trying to straighten out because percent per 100k doesn't make sense.