this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
357 points (93.6% liked)

Memes

11366 readers
491 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
357
Royal Fuckup (midwest.social)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by anachronist@midwest.social to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've literally never heard any human being praise or admire royalty, aside from Diana.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] meekah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 weeks ago

yeah but he didn't wear as many hats

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As long you don't say the hard r

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Compromise: we can keep monarchy but from now on they all have to wear bunny ears.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Only praise and admiration from very old people, for everyone else he's basically just a goofy mascot that keeps doing weird things.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

a goofy mascot that keeps doing weird things.

Sounds like exactly what a king should be.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 2 weeks ago

that's the only things a head of state should be allowed to do

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Argument from Ignorance (Ad Ignorantiam): This fallacy occurs when someone asserts that a proposition is false because they personally haven't heard of it, or it's not commonly known to them.

“Well, I've never heard of that” ⟶ Implies: “Therefore, it's probably wrong or not credible.”

It’s an epistemic fallacy, where the absence of knowledge is treated as evidence of absence or insignificance.

Essentially, your ignorance of the subject matter doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it just means you're ignorant of the subject matter. 🤷 🤣

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I missed the part where they said anything other than never having heard it themself. They never claimed that nobody says it. Maybe think about that next time you're going to be condescending for no reason.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You will not find that I have declared any fact beyond my ignorance, and it is rather the imputation of an assertion beyond that ignorance that constitutes the genuine fallacy here.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com -5 points 2 weeks ago

You're backpedaling now because you've been caught. I'd be humiliated too :)