this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
649 points (97.5% liked)

Chronic Illness

489 readers
210 users here now

A community/support group for chronically ill people. While anyone is welcome, our number one priority is keeping this a safe space for chronically ill people.

This is a support group, not a place for people to spout their opinions on disability.

Rules

  1. Be excellent to each other

  2. Absolutely no ableism. This includes harmful stereotypes: lazy/freeloaders etc

  3. No quackery. Does an up-to date major review in a big journal or a major government guideline come to the conclusion you’re claiming is fact? No? Then don’t claim it’s fact. This applies to potential treatments and disease mechanisms.

  4. No denialism or minimisation This applies challenges faced by chronically ill people.

  5. No psychosomatising psychosomatisation is a tool used by insurance companies and governments to blame physical illnesses on mental problems, and thereby saving money by not paying benefits. There is no concrete proof psychosomatic or functional disease exists with the vast majority of historical diagnoses turning out to be biomedical illnesses medicine has not discovered yet. Psychosomatics is rooted in misogyny, and consisted up until very recently of blaming women’s health complaints on “hysteria”.

Did your post/comment get removed? Before arguing with moderators consider that the goal of this community is to provide a safe space for people suffering from chronic illness. Moderation may be heavy handed at times. If you don’t like that, find or create another community that prioritises something else.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt Text:

Woman in a wheelchair saying: “THERE IS NO MARRIAGE EQUALITY UNTIL PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN MARRY WITHOUT LOSING BENEFITS”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Saying we need blood right now to water the tree of liberty IS a call to violence.

That would be true if that's what was said.

But looking back, they actually said they that they fear that time has come.

Expressing a credible fear of violence isn't a call for violence.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

We don't give the benefit of doubt on things like that. It's too easy to try and avoid responsibility by using weasel words.

"I'm afraid that..." can equally mean "I hate to say it but..."

So, yeah, erroring on the side of caution means the comment gets removed.

Same with the Nazi Bar premise: