I think it's hard to find satire in commercial products, because it needs to be sold to make back it's investment... so it veers into parody and entertainment, because those are more pleasant to experience.

I respect verhoeven's politics, and I have no doubt he set out to make a movie that would revolt anyone with a critical eye. even as a dumbass teenager I felt upset by Starship Troopers' for reasons I couldn't articulate. and, at the time, I felt like I must be weird, because while it revolted me but made my chuddy friends very excited and happy. so, unfortunately for art, but fortunately for the studios, the cinema-attending masses are incurious and uncritical in the US. that's the needle verhoeven threaded, erring on the side of careerism. no shade, we all gotta eat.

I think good satire, as I define it, is something fringe and often dismissed as preachy or too "dark" for the general public... because the public perhaps has limited interest in transgressive art/expression except in times of crisis.

maybe something that complicates our experience is that so much of the creative expressions we are invited to engage in the US are explicitly commercial, rather than actual public art.

so when we comb the landscape of our culture, looking for something authentic and truly revealing of our social problems, we are only ever searching through the garbage can of ideology. we think of entertainment products by default, instead of preachy street graffiti or other cracks in the facade where subversive thoughts make their home.