this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

El Chisme

426 readers
122 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

good satire makes the thing it satirized unpalatable to the people it lampoons with shame

that's a very good point, but then I think it begs the question: shameful to whom?

I say that because I think Starship Troopers (the discourse, I know) for example is great satire, but a fascist wouldn't be ashamed of liking it unironically among other fascists who also don't get that they're being made fun of

in the case of this album cover, is it successful satire if horny guys who sexualize women look at it and share it with other horny guys who do the same thing? she's an attractive woman in a very sexual scenario, so it would absolutely be very palatable to this audience

I'm not really arguing any points, just thinking out loud here because I think that's legit an interesting debate and I don't really have a solid take on it

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think it's hard to find satire in commercial products, because it needs to be sold to make back it's investment... so it veers into parody and entertainment, because those are more pleasant to experience.

I respect verhoeven's politics, and I have no doubt he set out to make a movie that would revolt anyone with a critical eye. even as a dumbass teenager I felt upset by Starship Troopers' for reasons I couldn't articulate. and, at the time, I felt like I must be weird, because while it revolted me but made my chuddy friends very excited and happy. so, unfortunately for art, but fortunately for the studios, the cinema-attending masses are incurious and uncritical in the US. that's the needle verhoeven threaded, erring on the side of careerism. no shade, we all gotta eat.

I think good satire, as I define it, is something fringe and often dismissed as preachy or too "dark" for the general public... because the public perhaps has limited interest in transgressive art/expression except in times of crisis.

maybe something that complicates our experience is that so much of the creative expressions we are invited to engage in the US are explicitly commercial, rather than actual public art.

so when we comb the landscape of our culture, looking for something authentic and truly revealing of our social problems, we are only ever searching through the garbage can of ideology. we think of entertainment products by default, instead of preachy street graffiti or other cracks in the facade where subversive thoughts make their home.