Privacy

39053 readers

518 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

441

“Localhost tracking” explained. It could cost Meta 32 billion. (www.zeropartydata.es)

submitted 1 week ago by the_abecedarian@piefed.social to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Meta devised an ingenious system (“localhost tracking”) that bypassed Android’s sandbox protections to identify you while browsing on your mobile phone — even if you used a VPN, the browser’s incognito mode, and refused or deleted cookies in every session."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TerHu@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

im wondering, does using uBlock help in any way? can they block metas pixel and thereby protect you?

[–] Luccus@feddit.org 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can Block WebRTC via uBlock.

From my understanding, this, along with setting Meta on fire, may mitigate the issue.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 4 points 1 week ago

Let the Zucc feel the heat

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Is that going to make video conference harder to use?

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Yes. Because it blocks the meta pixel script from loading to begin with.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I would say it prevents the downloading and execution of such a script. DNS adblock would probably help too.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

there is a blocklist with a name like block outsider intrusion to lan, but it's off by default