this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47218 readers
2086 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Airlines have launched a lobbying blitz in Brussels to combat efforts to allow larger cabin bags to fly for free.

That frisson of fear felt by many air passengers at the boarding gate about being hit with an extra charge for a carry-on bag is generating a political dogfight.

Spain had enough of the extra fees and fined five airlines for charging people for hand luggage; now the battle over the freedom to stuff a porkier bag into the overhead bin is being joined in other countries.

Consumer organizations from 12 European countries on Wednesday joined Spain’s legal battle against low-cost airlines charging passengers to bring larger carry-on suitcases on board.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

...unfunded individuals have an enormously worse chance of being heard. That's the whole point of organizing, including unionization.

One guy saying "hey maybe we should treat people better" can easily be ignored. A group, especially a national group with a large membership contributing resources is much, much harder to ignore. Banning organizing is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. (And in the US, it would be a violation of the first amendment right to assembly.)

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You can form groups without paying people. This ensures people actually care about the cause rather than just doing it for the money.

Banning lobbying isn't banning organizing. It's banning rich people being able to put their giant thumbs on the levers of democracy.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it limits the time they can dedicate. It means they can only do organizing outside of a full-time job. This is restrictive, and will actively hurt the ability of people to organize. The only people who will then be able to dedicate their time are those who have the excess free time and money. What you are suggesting would mean it's individuals like you or me going up against Jeff Bezos. Who do you think would win that fight?

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's only one Jeff Bezos. If he can't hire people, it's only what he can do himself in his spare time. We greatly outnumber him, even if we are only doing it in our spare time.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah... And when we work together, that's called organizing and lobbying, the thing you just said should be illegal.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Read the post. I said paying people to do it should be illegal. I don't say organizing should be illegal.