this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
76 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

70031 readers
4250 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I found the article to be rather confusing.

One thing to point out is that the video codec used in this research (but for which results weren't published for some reason), H264, is not at all state of the art.

H265 is far newer and they are already working on H266. There are also other much higher quality codecs such as AV1. For what it's worth, they do reference H265, but I don't have access to the source research paper, so it's difficult to say what they are comparing against.

The performance relative to FLAC is interesting though.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Vvc is h266, the spec is ready it's just not in a lot of hardware, or even decent software yet, that often takes a few years. The reference implementation encodes at like 1fps or less, but reference software is usually slow as hell in favor of correctness and code comprehension.

Av1 isn't much better than hevc (h265), it's just open and patent free and Google is pushing it like crazy.

It has iirc 1 major feature over hevc, non-square subpictures, beyond that it has some extensions for animation and slideshows basically.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder what the practical reasons for starting with h.264 are.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Low/no patent issues, much simpler complexity