this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
162 points (85.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31594 readers
1546 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Question for those of you living in a country where marijuana is legal. What are the positive sides, what are the negatives?

If you could go back in time, would you vote for legalising again? Does it affect the country's illegal drug business , more/less?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I've seen what fentanyl and tranq does to people first hand. Walking zombies with decaying flesh wounds that will kill them. Not all drugs should be legal for recreational use.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fentanyl and xylazine are only common because of prohibition; legalize all drugs, and opiate users will flock to heroin instead.

Also, the necrosis isn't caused by the drugs themselves, it's cutting agents, needle reuse, and poor sanitation. Legalization solves the first one, almost solves the second, and makes teaching about the third a lot easier.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Tranq, also known as Xylazine, specifically causes flesh wounds.

"A high prevalence of abscesses and painful skin ulcers [13] developed over various body parts irrespective of the IV injection site was reported. The mechanism is thought to be mediated by its direct vasoconstricting effect on local blood vessels and resultant decreased skin perfusion [6]. In addition to vasoconstriction, it causes hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression, leading to lower tissue oxygenation in the skin [14]. Thus, chronic use of xylazine can progress the vasoconstriction and skin oxygenation deficit, leading to severe soft tissue infections, including abscesses, cellulitis, and skin ulceration. Decreased perfusion also leads to impaired healing of wounds and a higher chance of infection of these ulcers [15]."

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9482722/

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Again, drug users do not seek these drugs. Drug dealers seek them because stronger drugs are easier to smuggle in smaller amounts for the same street value as a much larger quantity of heroin.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Again, drug users do not seek these drugs. Drug dealers seek them because stronger drugs are easier to smuggle in smaller amounts for the same street value as a much larger quantity of heroin.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly, those drugs are sought after because smuggling small amounts of them is much easier than smuggling larger amounts of heroin.

Black markets, drug markets, gang violence, the warehousing of impoverished people who get drawn in to all that. Nothing but bad comes from prohibition.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How's that working out? Prohibition has never done anything for addiction.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Prohibition in Singapore works swimmingly. But that's a single city state. It's much harder to stop drugs from coming into a country like America.

I don't think anyone should go to prison for consuming drugs. I also don't think fentanyl and drugs like it should be made any easier to obtain.

San Francisco has spent so much money trying to solve the fentanyl crisis and yet it still persists. I think the problem lies deeper in our culture. Substance abuse is just a symptom of our cultural illness.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

San Francisco has spent so much money trying to solve the fentanyl crisis and yet it still persists.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

No, it doesn't. Still drug addicts, still drug dealers and violent gangs that import and sell drugs.