this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)

Hardware

1923 readers
97 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Four threads per core?

Is that useful?

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yes, it's good for low complexity, large scope use cases.

The classic example is transaction processing (that's what those IBM mainframe with 4 way and 8 way SMT are often used for).

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I was gonna say this might be more proof of concept than actual applications right now

Make the hardware and they will come...

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Has been a thing in IBM processors for years.

They even do 8-way multithreading. Doesn't handle fundamentally different than 2-way, except you have less hardware = less compute per thread. Basically the same as using slower clocking cores, if they hide the multithreading right.