this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1337 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

7524 readers
1425 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m still a bit baffled it doesn’t work.

Like, the Left not doing enough SHOULD lead the right to decide “Dang, we need a message that appeals. Let’s blame the rich, and champion power over corporations!” But…instead they blame nonsensical things, promise nothing, and appeal to hatred, and get more than one vote.

That should just…never happen. That faction should be gonezo, making plenty of room for an independent party.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

The right just blaims the problems created by the rich on minorities like migrants, trans and homosexuals. That makes them look like they actually care about the people being hurt by the system, however also allows them to gain support from the rich. The rich do onw a lot of the media, which has massive influence on the vote.

The left party also knows this, so they usually do some minor things, which do not change the system too much in the hopes on not being hurt by the rich.

Oh and both parties are deeply corrupt.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It's because of this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schismogenesis

It's like being on a see saw, trying to get higher, with both sides doing extreme polar opposite actions eventually. Momentum is part of it. The idea is complex and the wiki doesn't do it justice, but it's fine.

The effect causes two well-meaning individuals having a conversation to ramp up different styles, resulting in a disagreement that does not stem from actual difference of opinion.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

This video explains it quite well:

Minority Rule: First Past the Post Voting by CP Grey.

The system isn’t designed to be a two-party system, but no matter how many parties there actually are are (in the US, there are actually more than a dozen active parties), FPTP voting inevitably results in only 2 being viable.

This will not change unless a different voting method is implemented.