this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
721 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

69600 readers
3552 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Now I understand why at each windows 11 update, they introduce more bugs than ever

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If they mean “30% of the code we wrote last month” then I might believe it. Though I bet it is not across the board but deep in one or two areas. Still, it’s a crazy number.

But he said something like “30% of the code in our repositories” which would mean everything, including their entire legacy of code. And that I simply do not believe.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 9 points 1 day ago

My first thought on reading that is: yeah, like about 98% of the human genome is "junk DNA" that we have little or no idea what it might be doing. Sometimes when we cut it out, nobody ever notices, sometimes when we cut it out the system won't boot up.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Its a shit article with Tech crunch changing the words to get people in a flap about AI (for or against), the actual quote is

"I'd say maybe 20 percent, 30 percent of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software"

"Written by software" reasonably included machine refactored code, automatically generated boilerplate and things generated by AI assistants. Through that lens 20% doesnt seem crazy.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

I've been "automatically writing code" for a system of about a dozen modules - we specify a glue file in .json between all the modules and the code generating software makes units to go in each module to do the communication interfacing based on the glue spec. That system has been running for more than 10 years now, it writes a couple hundred thousand lines of "new code" every time we modify the glue file.

[–] degen@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

The A stands for Automation, right?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It wouldn't surprise me at all if they entered the entire codebase for Windows 11 into an LLM and asked it to optimize it or some shit lol

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And surprise surprise, it's worse than ever

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Funny considering windows 7 consists of exactly 0% AI generated code.

[–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

lmao I just said the same thing before reading your comment

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah that’s a good point.

[–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Of course it's just bad writing, but I kind of wouldn't put it past management to try shoving their multitude of codebases through an LLM at this point.