Not with this Supreme Court. They've been happy to ignore the actual letter and intent of the constitution before. Democrats/liberals need to get out of the mindset that the law still matters to these people, it doesn't. You'll be lucky if the midterms still happen in 2026.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This Supreme Court has voted against Trump many times. They owe him nothing.

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 23 hours ago

And they did also do that little thing where the executive is now immune. Its a farce, shadow puppets to point at and sooth you til the next headline

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is an international law against removing all national ties to an individual. You cannot exile them from all countries with no home country. It's much bigger than the constitution at this point.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Just like there is an international law against genocide?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 19 hours ago

Yes, that's why you have to go visit Netanyahu in the Hague now.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, I'm sure the international law police is going to break down Trump's door and arrest him when he tries.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, but they'll step in to ensure that person isn't alienated from every country on earth.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

Who will step in? If Trump ships Americans to Guantanamo or El Salvador, who is going to do anything about it? If the past is any guide, even Democrats wouldn't go after Trump if they somehow manage to get in power again.