this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
90 points (98.9% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

865 readers
811 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Video


Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-04-16 02:46:43 PM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Empricorn 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Controversial, but I don't think any children should go on dates or pay taxes.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I don't know. 16 is plenty old to get a part time job and go on dates.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago

I don't think minors should have to pay income tax. "No taxation without representation... unless you're 16."

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Depends on your personal definition of child. 16 is definitely a teenager. For many people, those are distinctly different stages and do not overlap. A middle segment between child and adult. Whereas a different descriptor like minor would apply to both children and teenagers.

[–] Empricorn 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In the grand scheme of things, life experience, etc, yeah. 16 (or even 19) is still a child. But there's actually a huge difference in a teenager vs a single-digit child in terms of how they think and act. But I definitely shouldn't have lent my car to my 5 year-old nephew, I see that now...