this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
32 points (86.4% liked)

The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk

82 readers
9 users here now

Dunking on Liberals from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Dems keep working with trump to approve his picks, but what they won't accept is that if you sit down at a table with nazis, the only thing that's changed is the number of nazis at the table. @_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules:

We allow posts about liberal behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion.

Sister community: !tankiejerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Inspired by !tankiejerk@lemmy.world

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hey listen, the Republicans wrote the bill and overwhelmingly supported it. All the Democrats did was provide the required number of votes to actually pass the bill. I mean they practically did nothing wrong, right? lmao

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Actually, it would have passed if every Democrat voted Nay, by 3 votes.

216 R voted Yea and 208 of 213 dems voted Nay

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Simple majorities can't pass legislation, according to every dem that has ever had to excuse their failure of a party, so how did this one pass?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the Senate simple majorities cannot.

This vote was in the house.

SMH.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Really? I'm pretty sure this is magically going to pass the Senate too. Like nearly everything else republicans have put forward. What's the next excuse then? What's the excuse when they simply stop caring about decorum.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really?

...

You want me to clarify a second time that there is no filibuster in the House of Representatives?

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You want to explain why the unconstitutional practice of a filibuster stops dems but does not stop republicans?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This dude is trippling down on the imaginary house filibuster...

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This dude is tripling down on the idea republicans don't pass legislation far more frequently than dems despite never having a filibuster-proof Senate majority.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Okay that’s a valid point. But doesn’t disqualify the other point…

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's funny how we're being downvoted now. I thought .world hates when .ml "brigades" but I guess its okay to do it when you call out the Nazi enablers. 🤷

[–] nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

.ml is the only place they actually get downvoted, which is sad because it's filled with annoying 'Dengists'.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

"Look they brought in a gun, and I gave them the ammo to fire it. Am I really that bad?"