this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
130 points (99.2% liked)

GenZedong

4594 readers
74 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome again to everybody! This is your friendly reminder, growling at the United States from Orbit is praxis Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is our weekly discussion thread!

We have a Matrix homeserver at genzedong.xyz. See this thread for information about our Matrix space.

Short reading list for new MLs here. To find theory, try marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen, or Sci-Hub (for scientific articles). If an article is unavailable, try the Wayback Machine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Handheld ones? Asking because the TOS-1 has been used plenty in the war, and while it's likely classified as an MLRS by the west, it's called "heavy flamethrower system" in Russian.

Likewise, Shmel thermobaric launcher is also classified as a "flamethrower".

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah with the Russian military you can pretty much always translate "flamethrower" as some kind of thermobaric weapons. Flamethrowers are kids stuff when you can turn entire buildings in to dust or rip the lungs out of everyone in a bunker complex without having to get within a mile of it.

[–] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Aye, I figured it required clarification because when one reads "flamethrower" in media, it usually brings up the image of a WW1 style firehose with a backpack canister, wielded by a gasmask-wearing German. Which I suspect might be intentional.

They're still horrendous weapons, imo. But surely it's not as horrific as using white phosphorus, like the yanks did in Iraq?