this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
130 points (99.2% liked)
GenZedong
4594 readers
82 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Reading Russia MoD telegram I am seeing increasing reports of FLAMETHROWER crews from the Russian side.
Handheld ones? Asking because the TOS-1 has been used plenty in the war, and while it's likely classified as an MLRS by the west, it's called "heavy flamethrower system" in Russian.
Likewise, Shmel thermobaric launcher is also classified as a "flamethrower".
Yeah with the Russian military you can pretty much always translate "flamethrower" as some kind of thermobaric weapons. Flamethrowers are kids stuff when you can turn entire buildings in to dust or rip the lungs out of everyone in a bunker complex without having to get within a mile of it.
Aye, I figured it required clarification because when one reads "flamethrower" in media, it usually brings up the image of a WW1 style firehose with a backpack canister, wielded by a gasmask-wearing German. Which I suspect might be intentional.
They're still horrendous weapons, imo. But surely it's not as horrific as using white phosphorus, like the yanks did in Iraq?