this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
1108 points (99.1% liked)
Microblog Memes
7432 readers
2675 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I want to nitpick the definition of “waste” for a moment. Yes, you are using a lot of water, and energy if the water is heated, BUT if you’re getting something remotely positive out of it (and you’re paying for it), then I would not consider it wasteful. If you genuinely want to label it as something, then let’s compromise and call it therapeutic. Deal?
Unless you're in California or any other area with a low water table. Then it's a huge issue.
Compare this person’s shower to the many farms growing almonds in the same state.
Abolish almonds
Just abolished a bag this morning.
You are right
At the same time
I can’t whataboutism limited resources
If I was Governor of California I'd push to make it so Almonds and Alfalfa can't be grown during the drought seasons.
I can live without a legume and I don't think I know a single person in my entire circle's circles who has eaten alfalfa.
The alfalfa isn't for humans, it's for high intensity dairy and cattle farming.
It sucks that this is practically occult information. People have no understanding of the damage they do.
Yup, it’s just beef, cheese and milk. Though if you can find them without e.coli their sprouts are good on sandwiches too.
You must also consider the externalities, not just the financial cost that you bear personally.
I'd like to see it that way, but fresh water scarcity is a growing problem in many areas.
I have to wonder how much impact people taking 30-minute showers would have compared to corporate [mis]use.
Corporate waste massively overshadows personal use.
Then we should take it from companies that use it to cool AI super computers, mass surveillance networks, grow the worst water to plant ratio crops possible.
You could take a shower for 4 hours and it wouldn't make a dent to the misuse by corporations.
I saw an ad from Esso that said you can reduce gas usage by emptying out your trunk!
it's what would be described as "sub optimal use of a finite costly resource"
This is Lemmy, if you use water to water a plant, it never goes anywhere, it disappears entirely and there is no wider system that the water might become a part of, and if you eat an almond you've literally used all the water a city would use in a year.
If a billionaire enjoyed launching brand new cars off a cliff and considered it therapeutic would it not longer be a waste?
do cars evaporate and reaccumulate in the car supply eventually?
Water in the shower goes down the drain for most people. Probably as much evaporation as an exploded car.
...where it accumulates in underground caverns for ever?!?!
Processing waste water takes time, money and produces carbon emissions.
Then say that. Not that it can't evaporate.
The downvotes are frightening. The small things that millions of people do shape the planet.
I like a warm shower myself, but it comes with some guilt.
Just like with plant based diets it's really just par for the course. Even the smallest amount of taking accountability is like pulling teeth.
Much easier to blame the evil corporations who exist because billionaires want to destroy the planet and not because consumers buy their things.