this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1057 points (99.2% liked)

World News

45416 readers
4038 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Global leaders criticized Trump’s new tariffs, which range from 10% to 49%, warning of trade wars and economic fallout.

The UK and Italy urged negotiation, while Brazil passed a reciprocity bill. China and South Korea vowed countermeasures.

Australia and New Zealand rejected Trump’s logic, citing existing trade deals and low tariffs. Norfolk Island was baffled by a 29% duty despite having no exports.

Financial markets dropped, oil and bitcoin sank, and leaders warned of inflation. Analysts say Trump risks fracturing global trade with little to gain economically.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm actually pretty down with that that. We should be able and ready to produce whatever we need in case another country does what trump is doing or something happens that would prevent trade. If China attacks Taiwan, we should be able to produce our own chips. We should be able to function with as little dependence on other countries as possible.

In no way do tariffs fix that. You invest in yourself, slapping your friends because they're better than you at something is really fucking stupid.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He’s hoping the foreign companies are going to open up shop in USA to avoid the tariffs.

[–] tallpaul@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

Which they're not going to do as that takes time and meanwhile he keeps moving the goalposts.

[–] tallpaul@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Which they're not going to do as that takes time and meanwhile he keeps moving the goalposts.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

And they’ll just fill in the gaps with China, or other non USA alternatives.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Meh, I think it's fine and good for countries to specialize and be dependent on each other. Keeps the peace through mutually assured economic destruction. Global upticks in isolationism preceded the World Wars. Also, it just makes sense, because different countries have different resources, and their populations are differently skilled.