this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1410 points (99.4% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

1484 readers
334 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And why was that not offered to Luigi?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

They think they have a solid frame-up

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do we know that one wasn't offered? I was under the impression that Luigi has been pretty set on fighting the charges from the get go.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That could certainly be part of an answer to my question, were I to receive one.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Why was Luigi not offered a plea deal?" implies that you know that he was not offered a plea deal. I asked, do we know that? It would be news to me.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A valid answer to my question could be "you're wrong, he was." I'm fully open to being wrong. The fact that nobody mentioned that he was is a strong indicator that he wasn't.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The burden of proof of your own statements does not fall upon others.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Your question hangs upon, it requires, a condition which has not been proven true therefor you're claiming the condition is true by asserting the question is valid.

Suggested changes in how you present the statement:

"Was Luigi offered a plea deal? If not, why?"

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

The default is that a plea deal is not offered.

Please feel free to prove your assertion that he was given the option for a plea deal.