this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
106 points (97.3% liked)

politics

22527 readers
344 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cory Booker has been filibustering for a while, but there's no legislation that he's stalling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ScrewCapital@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It can be both theater and something. To use an extreme point, the Guillotines were theatrical.

He's thrown away one day of Senate procedure, and is not able to be stop until he sits or shuts up.

What would you have preferred the Dems have done to start? Expecting the Dems to be leftist is like expecting ducks to bark. We need to pat them on the head when they've done the bare minimum otherwise we won't even get that.

I'm sorry the world works that's way, I also wish it didn't but that's how it is.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guillotines were invented as the most humane way to execute someone with the technology available at the time. Also during that time public executions aren't uncommon, the French revolution didn't introduce the theatrics they just used what was at the time the modern method of execution. The point of the guillotine wasn't the theatrics it was the killing of your class enemies. Executions in general were held in public already cause it was really fucking easy to get away with crime back then so making public examples was the best they could do in their minds and the same idea of making an example extended to the French revolution. It was the poor being guillotined for petty crimes before and they were using the instruments of the oppressor that was already in place.

[–] ScrewCapital@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing about what you're saying is wrong, however if you don't think there was also a layer of theatrics in the public executions of the aristocrats where they chopped their damn heads off.... I have no clue what to say to you to convince you to otherwise lmfao

Theatrics btw are not bad. If you're being purely pragmatic then people will never give a fuck about you, the problem is "Pure Theatrics" you also need substance.

Which is why I used the guillotine as an example, it had substance and it has theatrics.

Do you thinking when Mussolini's body was publicly desecrated there wasn't any theatrics or point to it? Do you think Sherman's scorching the land to bring terror in the hearts of slave owners had no theatrics?

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think a dude pissing in a bucket so he can keep rambling nonsense is even remotely similar?

[–] ScrewCapital@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're jumping all over the place bro.

Yes I do, it's a smaller scale. He's got people's attention, the people are saying "do this more often" maybe more days will be disrupted.

Better than no days disrupted

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

I think you just have a piss fetish

[–] WizardOfLoneliness@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What would you have preferred the Dems have done to start

It would have been very cool if, going back to 2016, they hadn't intentionally boosted Trump as part of a sociopathic plan to raise the likelihood of Hillary winning the general election (you can see how well that turned out), I think I would have definitely preferred that

Right now I would prefer if they were all thrown into a pit so that leaders who aren't at BEST feckless and incompetent and AT WORST literally fascist collaborators could step in and actually offer real opposition

instead we're getting dipshits jerking themselves raw over how RADICAL CIVILITY will defeat Trump (and people like you soypoint-2 over it apparently, "aT lEaSt tHeY aRE dOiNg SoMeThInG!" give me a fucking break)

[–] Dirt_Possum@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can be both theater and something.

Yes, an act can be both theater and make a material difference. This is not though, it is only theater and devoid of anything meaningful or material. He wouldn't be doing it otherwise because he represents the same ruling class the republicans do, you goddamned fool.

Also get the fuck out of here with your "I'm more leftist than you!" bullshit while talking about how we have to give our explicit ruling class enemies a "pat on the head" for pretending they're presenting any kind of opposition. Many of us here have been organizing and providing mutual aid for decades, and even if you're not lying about the actual material work you've done (which I doubt), it doesn't change the fact that your advocating for liberal, bourgeois politicians doing performative kayfabe undeniably makes you also a liberal with zero knowledge of theory or any understanding of what's actually happening here.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

What would you have preferred the Dems have done to start?

Well, since you mentioned guillotines...