this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
754 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
3970 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As someone that maintains Outlook users, I can’t wait. Dumping decades of garbage code is a godsend.

Most businesses will be fine. The edge case scenarios will bitch and moan but will get over it by the following fiscal quarter.

New outlook will be easier than ever to upgrade. Code security will be better than ever before. Also no more unique software for non-Windows OS’s. OSX and Linux support will be a good feature that’s missing today.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think anybody is arguing against a more efficient product. The issue I see is the multiple, incompatible versions with confusing naming schemes that exist simultaneously.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a necessity. It’s too different. It won’t ever have feature parity, and you need to give companies time to adapt their edge case uses.

They did the same thing with Teams and did worse with OneNote.

They did themselves a favor and killed off the Mail app ahead of time at least.

I think calling one “new” and the other “classic” is easy enough. The only alternative is to use a different name entirely.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ugh, I used the "Mail" app exactly once, in 2017. That should tell you all you need to know 😂

They could just not release the "new" Outlook until it's more feature complete...

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why? Dumping that shitty code as fast as possible is a win for everyone. It’s been completely capable as a mail app for over a year. It’s barely-used functions that are missing.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Barely-used functions like PST files and clicking on something without waiting 3 seconds for an effect.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s webmail with an offline mode, of course it’s collecting data.

This was already happening for most of their paying customers, and the data they connect is retained on a per-tenant basis.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

yeah, but with this version now they collect all their emails from all non-microsoft accounts too. only reliable way to stop that is to change passwords