65
Half-Life 2 RTX and all of its foggy, ray-traced lighting is getting a demo next week
(www.rockpapershotgun.com)
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
65 points (94.5% liked)
Games
18104 readers
333 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In theory, yea it should. But this is developed by Nvidia with their own graphics cards in mind. If this is similar to Portal RTX, then RDNA3 cards will be able to run it, just with severly crippled performance.
Yea but isn't AMDs ray tracing performance severely crippled in general? I thought if you want to use ray tracing your far better of buying from team green.
I was under the impression that RDNA3 was still pretty bad at raytracing in general. What I'm really wondering though, having just bought a 9070 XT, is what about RDNA4?
Out of curiosity, what are you upgrading from? I've a 3070 and I'm wondering if now's the time to jump back to team red.
A Vega 56. If you think your 3070 might be obsolete we have vastly different perspectives, LOL!
I don't think it's obsolete by any means - it is driving an ultrawide monitor and the RAM upgrade might be nice longer term, this gen is slightly more reasonably priced for AMD, Nvidia driver upgrades are painful on linux, so I wanted to know if there's a significant uplift/how well does it handle RT in comparison to justify a switch for me.
Well, all I know is that it's a significant uplift over a Vega. I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be faster than a 3070, but I'm not sure if it's enough faster to be worth it. I guess if it's on the bubble, AMD playing nicer with Linux might push it over the edge. You should read/watch reviews or something; you'll be able to get much better advice from e.g. Gamer's Nexus than from me.
One thing I will say is that, in my experience, standing in line at Microcenter on launch day is the only way to have a decent chance at getting a video card at MSRP these days. Since you missed that for the 9070 XT, maybe wait until whatever AMD makes next (9070 XTX? 9060? 9080??) comes out and try to get one of those on launch day.
You should definitely not be desperate enough to pay higher-than-MSRP prices just to get more RAM and easier to deal with drivers.
You make a good point, I'll watch reviews and that sometimes it's nice to get an.average user opinion too! I'm probably at least 6 months away from buying anything unless I see a complete bargain. Not being sure I should get it should probably be an indicator I'm okay for now! Thanks.