this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
535 points (99.3% liked)

World News

43954 readers
3255 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mark Carney was sworn in as Canada's 24th prime minister on March 14, declaring "We will never, in any shape or form, be part of the US," rejecting Donald Trump's annexation threats.

Carney won the Liberal leadership with 85.9% of the vote despite having no elected experience.

He called US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's suggestion that Canada would be better as "the 51st state" simply "crazy."

Carney is expected to call an election soon as he faces the challenge of managing Trump's trade war that threatens to push Canada into recession.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was once a literal war with guns between the US and Canada (War of 1812} and Canada won.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Things have changed a lot since then. The US has over 1 million active personnel to Canada's <100k. If it comes to a real invasion, things would not go well.

The real question is how many Americans would be willing to participate in that invasion.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 1337@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A declaration of war from the current leader of NATO will likely fracture what is currently NATO. Europe will want to help Canada, but they will be preoccupied with suppressing Russia's aggression, because there is no longer a NATO.

Canada won't have NATO. At best it will have half of NATO.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 23 hours ago

That "half of NATO" has nuclear weapons.

The US hasn't experienced a war on it's own soil in living memory. Americans shit their pants when they see a couple of drones over New Jersey. And Americans don't have the will to endure a long drawn out occupation even when there's an ocean between them and a war. Canadians will endure it, because we would have no other choice.

This would be a war of betrayal. Trump would need to have Elon Musk purge the US military of anyone with even an once of honour and courage. Currenttly Trump is demanding Canada to defend the US border for him. The US would need to defend it's border, and that's a long border. You'd also need to have checkpoints in the US where soldiers will check your papers because Canadians would be trying to infiltrate the US and hit the soft targets everywhere. There would be raids on your houses to find and Canadians or any sympathizers. How willing are you do have these things happen?

Because it would be betraying an ally, the US would have zero allies in this war. Canada would get lethal aid from Europe and likely from Asia too. And Canadians know how to make an IED. Because our soldiers served in Afghanistan. Alongside the US military that's going to betray the soldiers it fought alongside a few short years ago. And why? Because of the whims of a deranged old man? So you might have a slight morale problem.

While you're looking at troop strengths on spreadsheet, we're looking at the willingness of Americans to do what would need to be done for decades to succeed in occupying a neighbouring country. We only need to outlast you, while you need to have the will to watch young people coming back from the north in body bags. For decades.

The chance of the US winning a war like this is basically zero.

[–] Aequitas38472@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The recent film Civil War gives a good example of what could happen. There is certainly a subset of Trump supporters that would follow orders. But a large segment would likely split off and further divide the country.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 22 hours ago

Yep it will not be one side versus the other. It will be a mixed bag of violence and chaos.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given the U.S.’s recent experiences in Afghanistan and Iraq, countries far smaller and with far fewer resources (natural and industrial) than Canada, I like our (Canada’s) chances!

Plus our military may be small but it’s elite, composed of professional soldiers extremely well-versed in US (and NATO) operations and tactics. If Middle Eastern countries with largely irregular forces can give the U.S. migraines using guerrilla tactics, we can do the same with far better results.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

They also had the advantage of distance. The US had to ship their resources there. Here, they just drive over the border.

I'm also Canadian, and in full-scale war, I do not like Canada's chances.

Not to mention, it would be a stupid senseless war, much like what's happening in Ukraine

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Drive across the border… then what? Canada is vast. A million soldiers is not a lot compared to this landscape. Even if you only consider the 100 mile strip of land along the border. It’s a vast area to occupy…. and then do what with it?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Going to Ottawa and completely disrupting and dismantling the government would probably be a solid first step.

I'm sure Big Balls would be thrilled to help as he's done in the US.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

That’s not gonna work. The prime minister and the rest of the government MPs will escape before they can be captured.

That’s what Napoleon tried to do when he invaded Russia. I predict similar results.