this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

Firefox

19027 readers
144 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FWIW, the Mozilla CEO salary actually went down in the last year we have records. From about $6.9 million to $6.2. (The base salary is still around $600,000, and the rest is a bonus.)

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as is it millions it's too much.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree, but I've seen so many arguments that "you need to pay the CEO millions, otherwise you'll lose a CEO that's definitely worth millions." Not a great argument, but I think it's somewhat laid bare by breaking down their actual salary versus their bonus, which is... Over nine times their salary.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I would make more sense if the CEO was doing a good job

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago

I think the more realistic argument is that CEOs have an inherent incentive to take big risks. If they get lucky and succeed, they get credited for the win, can put it in their portfolio and then demand better pay or move on to another company which will pay them more. If they fail, they can quietly resign, take the golden parachute and move on to the next company after a year or two as though nothing has happened. A big salary incentivizes them to keep their job, thus disincentivizing them from taking risks.