this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1013 points (98.2% liked)

196

4916 readers
2044 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you're being sincere, but saying the same boring shit over and over about the dems isn't doing shit either. Mobilizing them would look a bit different than that.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what would mobilizing them look like? They know what we want them to do, is it a lack of motivation? A lack of incentive? If the threat of losing their core voters isn't enough to get them to act, what is?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Don't know. I just know that going after the dems the way it seems to be happening, isn't working.

Right now, it goes like this:

  • Republicans and/or Trump do something fucking crazy that's not only never been done before, but probably illegal.
  • Everyone shouts frantically, "WhY areN'T tHe DeMS doINg ANyThiNG!" while saying in a rational, quiet, tone, "That's just how Republicans are."
  • Repeat
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a valid question. Why are the Democrats censuring their own? Why aren't the Democrats supporting the popular candidates who can mobilize voters but are more progressive than they would like?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you're telling me, “That’s just how Republicans are.”

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, I'm saying we need to clean house before looking across the aisle. If we can't even convince our own side that this is urgent and not a game, how on earth are we going to convince the people actively tearing the country apart?

Also, if you think a well reasoned article and an open ear are enough to get the republicans to change, you're sorely mistaken.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

No, I’m saying we need to clean house before looking across the aisle.

Okay, what does cleaning house look like? Because some of those people are in red districts. Also, could you fix the gerrymandering while you're at it? The electoral college is pretty bad and so is voter suppression. After we do all that, we'll get money out of politics.