this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
343 points (99.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5999 readers
405 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tougher laws said to be inspiring clandestine attacks on the ‘property and machinery’ of the fossil fuel economy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

why climate activists are turning to sabotage instead of protest

Because violence and sabotage brings attention

[–] jagged_circle 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just attention, but increases risk so companies avoid such activities if they know the reward (dividend paid to shareholders) doesn't justify the risk (equipment being damaged, assets being burned)

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Don't forget the cost of insurance. That's the big one. If it stops being possible to insure fossil fuel infrastructure, then investments shift to renewables that can be insured. It's pretty simple economic math.

Edit: that also works in all levels of the economy. Pipeline constitution vehicle get torched every time there's a pipeline built? Uninsurable therefore reduce or stop investment. Cas in cities always get flat tires and vandalized? People won't buy cars they can't insure.

[–] jagged_circle 3 points 19 hours ago

Also insurance companies that provide insurance for such companies are themselves valid targets for direct actions to cause economic loss.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll be even more frank: because it's the only thing that works.