this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
4267 points (98.6% liked)

Games

37293 readers
1292 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goronmon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I mean yeah but gamers keep supporting shitty companies...

Yeah, shitty companies like Valve with their lootbox nonsense and other gambling mechanics are really bringing the industry down.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (7 children)

They're entirely cosmetic in Valve games as far as I'm aware

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

The argument of cosmetic only microtransactions is also a bit of a weak one because it's the sort of content that would usually just be in the base game, unlockable via gameplay or tied to cheat codes. At least this used to be the case.

Cosmetic only is still better than other types but it's still a case of the lesser of two evils.

[–] eliza_stats@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I like the way Grinding Gear does it with POE, a FTP game supported by cosmetic-only micro transactions. The stash tabs are the closest thing to "pay to win".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)